Last week I watched a PR agency charge $3,000 for a press release that got exactly zero coverage. Not one journalist opened it. The tracking showed 12 total views - probably all from the client’s team.
Meanwhile, a competitor dropped a Twitter thread that got picked up by three major publications. Cost them nothing but 20 minutes of writing. That’s the state of PR in 2019 - the old playbook is dead but agencies keep selling it.
Remember when Todd Defren at SHIFT Communications invented the “social media press release” back in 2006? Revolutionary at the time. Instead of walls of text, we’d have:
Brilliant idea. Except journalists stopped caring about press releases entirely around 2015.
I know because I tracked opens on 200+ releases across different formats. Traditional releases: 15% open rate. Social media optimized releases: 18% open rate. Twitter DM to the same journalists: 67% open rate.
The format wasn’t the problem. Press releases themselves were.
Journalists get 200+ pitches daily. Their inbox is a disaster zone of PR spam. Your beautifully formatted social media press release? It’s competing with:
Even if they open it, they’re skimming for 3 seconds max. Those multimedia elements you carefully embedded? Never clicked. The social links? Ignored.
But here’s the kicker - companies still need media coverage. The tactics just changed completely.
Direct social engagement beats press releases
Find the journalist on Twitter. Comment thoughtfully on their articles for two weeks. Then slide into DMs with your story. Success rate jumps from 2% to 25%.
I got TechCrunch coverage for a client by responding to a reporter’s tweet about industry trends with relevant data. No press release. No pitch email. Just useful information at the right time.
Create the story yourself
Why write a press release hoping someone covers your announcement when you can publish the story directly? Medium, LinkedIn, Twitter threads - journalists monitor these for story ideas.
Published a controversial LinkedIn post about marketing automation that got 50k views. Three publications reached out asking to republish. The “press release” was the content itself.
Give exclusive data
Journalists need unique angles. Everyone announces product launches. Nobody shares real data.
Compiled PPC spending data from 100 campaigns and offered it exclusively to one publication. They bit immediately. The “press release” was a one-page data summary with key findings.
Some situations still require old-school press releases:
But even then, the social media press release format doesn’t help much. Journalists who still read press releases want facts fast. They’re not watching your embedded video.
Here’s what I do for clients now:
This gets 5-10x more coverage than any press release format.
Last example: Client launched a new product. Instead of a press release, we:
Results: 4 publication mentions, 200+ social shares, 15 quality backlinks. The PR Web release? Zero direct coverage.
The social media press release was a good idea that missed the real problem. Journalists don’t want better formatted announcements. They want stories their readers care about, delivered how they prefer to receive them.
Stop optimizing the format. Start creating actual news.