5 Tips for Writing Controversial Blog Posts That Don't Backfire

January 12, 2020
pbn blog seo user engagement

Remember when that fitness influencer said cardio was pointless and lost 100k followers overnight? Yeah, that’s what happens when you do controversial content wrong. But when you nail it? Man, the traffic is insane.

I’m not gonna pretend I haven’t screwed this up before. Posted a hot take about Google penalties being mostly myth back in 2018. Got absolutely roasted. Turns out timing matters when you’re calling BS on industry sacred cows.

But I’ve also published stuff that made people genuinely angry and still thanked me later. Like that piece about PBNs being safer than guest posting (still stand by that one). The trick isn’t avoiding anger - it’s channeling it productively.

1. Make sure you can actually win the argument

Writing “WordPress sucks” is easy. Backing it up when 40% of the web runs on it? Good luck with that comment section.

Pick fights where you’ve got receipts. Real data, not just opinions. I wrote a piece claiming most SEO audits are useless theater. Could’ve been career suicide. But I had spreadsheets from 47 client audits showing which recommendations actually moved rankings. Hard to argue with evidence.

The worst controversial content is when you’re obviously wrong but too stubborn to admit it. Internet never forgets that stuff.

2. Don’t punch down

Going after newbies or small players makes you look petty. Challenge the big dogs, the accepted wisdom, the “everyone knows” stuff that nobody’s actually tested.

Calling out specific small agencies by name? Dick move. Questioning whether Moz’s DA metric causes more harm than good? Fair game - they’re big enough to handle criticism.

Plus punching up gets you noticed by people who matter. Punch down and you just look bitter.

3. Give people an out

Nobody changes their mind when you call them idiots. Even if they are.

Frame it like “This works better in most cases” not “Anyone doing X is braindead.” Leave room for edge cases and exceptions. The goal is starting conversations, not holy wars.

Best controversial piece I ever wrote was “Why Most Link Building Outreach Templates Guarantee Failure.” Instead of attacking people using templates, I showed why personalization beats automation. Same message, different framing. One starts fights, other starts discussions.

4. Time it when people are already pissed

Right after Google does something stupid? Perfect timing for that controversial algo theory. Major site gets penalized? Great time to discuss whether they deserved it.

Ride existing waves of frustration. Don’t try creating them from nothing.

Published a piece about toxic SEO Twitter personalities right after major drama went down. 50k views in three days because everyone was already heated about the topic. Same piece a month later would’ve gotten crickets.

5. Have your defense ready BEFORE you publish

The comments are coming. The Twitter mob might show up. Maybe even legal threats if you’re spicy enough.

Before hitting publish:

  • Screenshot everything you reference (people delete tweets)
  • Have follow-up data ready for obvious counterarguments
  • Know your legal boundaries (especially with comparisons)
  • Decide your walk-back strategy if you’re wrong

Learned this after accusing a tool of faking data. They threatened lawyers. Lucky for me I had the receipts, but man that was a stressful week.

Look, controversial content is playing with fire. Sometimes you get burned. I’ve had posts kill client relationships, trigger review bombs, even got SWATted once (don’t recommend).

But vanilla content gets ignored. And ignored content makes zero money.

Just remember - there’s smart controversial and stupid controversial. Smart challenges ideas with evidence. Stupid challenges people with insults. Figure out which one you’re writing before you hit publish.