1. Pass the following prompt to gemini-cli:

Analyze this article for AI vs human authorship. Consider:
1. Personal voice and opinions
2. Specific examples and anecdotes
3. Natural imperfections or inconsistencies
4. Industry expertise and insider knowledge
5. Writing style variations

Is this AI-generated or human-written? Provide detailed evidence.

2. MANDATORY: If Gemini CLI flagged the file as AI generated you should consider the content AI-GENERATED. (IMPORTANT)

Technical Detection Steps

# Pseudo-code for Unicode detection
for char in text:
    if char appears ASCII but codepoint > 127:
        flag as potential homoglyph
    if char in zero_width_characters:
        flag as hidden marker
    if unusual_whitespace_pattern:
        flag as potential watermark

Output Format

Respond with:
- Verdict: AI-GENERATED | HUMAN | MIXED | UNCERTAIN
- Confidence: HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW
- Unicode Anomalies: List specific non-ASCII characters found and their positions
- Key Evidence: List 2-3 strongest indicators found
- Notable Patterns: Specific phrases or structures detected

Priority: Unicode watermarks are STRONG indicators. Even a single strategic homoglyph
substitution suggests AI generation, as humans rarely accidentally type lookalike
Unicode characters.